A Senate Democratic report warns AI and automation could eliminate up to 100 million U.S. jobs over the next decade, raising political pressure for oversight. Google Europe EVP Debbie Weinstein called for EU AI rules to be streamlined, citing regulatory complexity that hinders innovation. The UK is reportedly considering an AI bill that would relax planning and environmental rules for large AI data centre projects, in designated “growth zones”.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen urged an EU push on self‑driving tech with AI pilots across European cities, positioning mobility as a priority for competitiveness and safety. Von der Leyen also said the EU will table a unified “28th regime” for start‑ups in 2026 to simplify scaling across borders. In the United States, Axios flagged a Commerce Department “50% rule” that could expand export‑control licensing duties to foreign subsidiaries majority‑owned by restricted entities, with notable implications for AI supply chains. A U.S. policy proposal for independent AI safety certification panels advanced in several states, offering limited liability for firms that meet higher safety standards.

The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority proposed a new post‑Brexit tech licensing regime to replace the old EU‑era framework. Media commentary criticised the UK’s digital ID push, warning that lax oversight by the Information Commissioner risks turning the programme into state surveillance. Senators Hawley and Blumenthal drafted a U.S. bill requiring advanced AI systems to undergo a formal risk evaluation before deployment.

Today, the major AI‑law movement combines new rules taking effect in California with Europe sharpening implementation tools. Meanwhile, Germany moves to tie AI into its economic revival strategy.

Today highlighted how AI law is fragmenting into sector rules and jurisdictional mandates. The UK is shaping healthcare and IP oversight, while California has made disclosure of AI safety practices a legal duty.