Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v iTutorGroup, Inc., Tutor Group Limited, and Shanghai Ping’an Intelligent Education Technology Co., Ltd.

Date
Citation
No. 1:22-cv-02565 (E.D.N.Y.)
Adjudicator
District Court, Eastern District of New York
Jurisdiction

Background
In EEOC v iTutorGroup, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission brought an action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) alleging that iTutorGroup’s online recruitment software automatically rejected female applicants aged 55 or older and male applicants aged 60 or older. The parties resolved the case through a consent decree, under which iTutorGroup agreed to pay USD 365,000 in relief and implement injunctive measures, including eliminating age-based screening criteria and revising its hiring systems.

AI interaction
‘Defendants are enjoined from rejecting or screening applicants based on sex or age, and from requesting or considering dates of birth prior to extending a job offer.’ The decree marks one of the first legally enforceable remedies against algorithmic age discrimination in automated hiring, underscoring that machine-learning recruitment systems are subject to civil-rights and equal-opportunity laws.

Note: The Consent Decree (filed 9 August 2023) provides detailed injunctive terms and is accessible here. The case stands as an early enforcement precedent confirming that the use of automated tools in employment decisions does not exempt employers from anti-discrimination obligations under U.S. law.